First Quarter 2006 Update and Company Reports

 

Linens ‘n Things was acquired on February 15, 2006 for $28 cash per share by Apollo Management, L.P.  We originally purchased this inexpensive household products retailer over its then expensive direct competitor Bed, Bath & Beyond (BBBY $38) in hopes that a management change in late 2004 would lead to an improvement in the productivity of its stores, driving earnings growth.  Numerous metrics of management and store productivity confirm the vast performance superiority of Bed, Bath & Beyond.  A narrowing of the performance spread between these two otherwise similar companies would have made Linens a rewarding long-term investment.  Instead, Apollo made it a rewarding short-term investment.  Meanwhile, Bed, Bath & Beyond dipped from the mid-40’s to high 30’s, thus creating a purchasing opportunity that one should not miss for such a beautifully managed company.

 

Revenues and earnings have increased every year without fail for the past ten years at Bed, Bath & Beyond, averaging 30% annual growth.  Metrics of store performance, such as sales per square foot, sales per store, profit margin, and return on investment have grown with incredible consistency over the 34 year life of this company.  Consistency is a sign of great management.  Because of the size of the company, annual growth over the coming ten years will be slower – revenues at 12% and earnings per share at 15% annually compounded would be quite satisfactory.  The company has several growth drivers.  First, it builds new stores, cookie cutter fashion.  An additional 80 stores are planned for 2006, growth of 11% over the existing base of 742 stores.  The company projects it can eventually build 1,300 total stores.  Second, it can increase same store sales, and a range of 3 to 5% is targeted in 2006.  Finally, the company also owns two smaller store chains.  Christmas Tree Shops, with 29 stores, and Harmon Stores, with 38 stores, can grow from their small bases much faster than Bed, Bath & Beyond.

 

Bed, Bath & Beyond’s business depends on a robust consumer.  Certain factors, such as rising mortgage rates, high energy costs, and slowing home sales weigh on the consumer and the stock price.  These factors are at least partially offset by employment gains and growth in real household earnings.  Only time will tell if the stock price, down from $45, has sufficiently discounted these factors.

 

However, two less cyclical drivers for household products businesses, the rates of household formation and home ownership, are quite positive.  Two major demographic factors, the maturing of “Generation Y” (the 72 million Americans born since 1978) and immigration, portend long-term strength for household sector.  Clearly, we believe that purchases in the mid- to high-30’s are very attractive for the long-term investor.

 

Bed, Bath & Beyond generates significant levels of free cash flow.  Last year, the company allocated $600 million for the repurchase of 16.4 million shares at an average price of $36.60 per share, reducing the share count by 3.5%.  Analyst consensus earnings per share estimates for the next five years are $2.18 in 2006, followed by $2.51, $2.88, $3.32, and $3.75, respectively.  Cash earnings drive intrinsic value, so an intrinsic value estimate based on consensus earnings is currently in the mid-40’s and grows to the mid-80’s in 2011.

 

Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (WWY $47) is one of the highest quality companies one can own.  Founded in 1893, the company spent its first 82 years selling only four gum products.  The decision to expand the number of individual gum brands in 1975 led to a 30 year period of double-digit revenue and earnings growth, characterized by exceptional consistency.  Management still owns over 30% of the stock, helping to keep the company focused on the creation of shareholder value.  It has been years since the stock has traded at or below our estimate of intrinsic value.  Due to acquisitions made last year, 2006 will see a failure to break the double-digit earnings growth hurdle.  The stock has responded accordingly.  Similar past episodes of Wrigley stock price weakness have proven to be great buying opportunities.  Note that the company just split its stock 5:4, which also served to reduce the apparent price.

 

Wrigley is the world’s largest chewing gum company.  It’s brand names include Doublemint, Spearmint, Juicy Fruit, Big Red, WinterFresh, Extra, Orbit, Freedent, Bubble Tape, Big League Chew, and Hubba Bubba.  Growing this business is the company’s top priority.  Expansion into confectionery brands is part of a long-term growth strategy, focused, in particular, on China and India.  Last year Wrigley expanded by acquiring Altoids and Lifesavers.  The dilution from this acquisition and the need to ramp advertising and marketing expenditures for these brands will cause 2006 earnings to grow at an uncommonly low rate.  However, Wrigley’s global distribution talents should benefit Altoids and Lifesavers, driving increased earnings in 2007 and beyond.

Management decisions at Wrigley are made for the long-term benefit of shareholders.  Brands are built to last for generations, and the world-wide supply chain has been built with the goal of permanent global positioning.  Investment in innovation has led to an unprecedented increase in the percentage of sales that come from new products.  A manifestation of management’s increased attention to innovation is the new Global Innovation Center, which for the first time brings Wrigley’s research and development personnel together into one facility.

 

First quarter 2006 revenues grew 13% over the same period in 2005, reflecting the addition of Altoids and Lifesavers revenues.  Another contributor was 26% revenue growth in Asia.  Wrigley emerged as the number one confectionary company in China.  However, first quarter earnings were flat after adjusting for currency translation, stock options expense, and restructuring charges.  This reflects the lower margins from Altoids and Lifesavers, along with increased marketing expenditures to restore momentum in these two brands.

 

Analyst consensus earnings projections for the next five years, starting with 2006, are presently $2.04, $2.24, $2.49, $2.76, and $3.06.  I consider the estimates for 2006 and 2007 to be optimistic.  However, this is still excellent growth, leading to an intrinsic value estimate in the high 40’s now and mid-$70’s in five years.  The dividend is raised every year and currently yields 2.7%.

 

Risks include: 1) Wrigley’s success in integrating the Altoids and Lifesavers acquisitions, which will improve profit margins and, 2) competition from Cadbury-Schweppes, which acquired the Adams brands (Chiclets, Trident and Dentyne gums, Clorets, and Halls cough drops) from Pfizer in 2003.

 

Pfizer (PFE $25) just reported first quarter 2006 earnings per share growth of 13% (61 cents compared to 54 cents.)  Pfizer has done a great job of controlling expenses.  However, revenues were down 3%.  The issue facing the world’s largest pharmaceutical company is revenue growth.  Lipitor’s growth may flatten due, among other factors, to competing Zocor losing patent protection.  Generic Zocor will be priced at a fraction of Lipitor, and works nearly as well.  Also, billion dollar drugs Zoloft, Norvasc, Neurontin, Zithromax, and Diflucan have recently or will soon face patent expiration.  Meanwhile, revenues from recently approved drugs grew, including Sutent (anti-cancer,) Exubera (inhaled insulin,) Eraxis (antifungal,) Lyrica (neuropathic pain and anti-epileptic,) Macugen (wet macular degeneration,) and Geodon (antipsychotic.)  The pipeline of drugs in various stages of the approval process is very impressive, including potential blockbusters Varenicline for smoking cessation, Torcetrapib for cholesterol management, and Ticilimumab for cancer.  Operating cash flow of $16 billion creates enormous financial flexibility, funding a recent 25% increase in the dividend, a projected $4 billion stock repurchase, and 2006 research and development spending of $8 billion.

 

Computers and spreadsheets have given financial analysts the ability to swiftly run scenario analyses.  So, we have valued Pfizer using three different five year revenue growth assumptions.  First assuming analyst consensus 5% growth, intrinsic value is estimated at $35.  More conservative estimates of 3% and 0% revenue growth lead to intrinsic values of $30 and $25, respectively.  Our best guess is zero revenue growth for 2006 and 2007 followed by 5% revenue growth, yielding an intrinsic value estimate of $31.

 

Steven L. Ré, CFA                                                                                                        April 26, 2006

This report contains the current opinions of the author and such opinions are subject to change without notice.  It has been distributed for information purposes only and is not to be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities.  The information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable but is not guaranteed.  It should not be assumed that investments in any of the above-mentioned securities will be profitable, and past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Earnings projections often miss and markets go up and down.  The employees and families of Quality Growth Management, Inc. may own the above-mentioned securities in their own accounts, and may trade them at any time without notice.